If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me :). So we need to use allow to assume that this object has some methods and returns predefined values. This object isn't existed in your real system, it doesn't own methods and attributes. #Rspec allow raise error codeThe error is not getting raised when I am trying to run the test case. 2 I am trying to raise an error using the below rpsec code allowanyinstanceof (ClientClass).to receive (:instancemethod). allowanyinstanceof (ClientClass).to receive (:instancemethod).andraise (ErrorClass, 'Error raised') def tobetestedcode do some stuff client ClientClass.new client.instancemethod do other stuff end. But in this test in rspec-mock its working, but in case it ever regresses to the behavior Im seeing. To answer this question, we should refer to the concept of Test Doubles:Ī test double is an object that stands in for another object in your system during a code example rspec raiseerror not working with allowanyinstance. and its failing to report the exception/error. Sum up:Ī big difference between them is that ASSUME and EXPECT Deep magic: You EXPECT that when book object calls title method, it'll return that string "The RSpec Book". We strongly recommend to do this as non-verified stubs are. allow: book = double("book")Īllow(book).to receive(:title) You can configure RSpec 3.3+ to raise an error when attempting to stub or mock a non-existing method. You know allow and expect are used in rspec-mocks, but you are confused with them ?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |